Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

May 27 2015

thatsridicarus

feminist-elizabethan:

 Feminist Elizabethan | Gender Script is Flipped by Cosmo UK in Scarlett Johansson and Mark Ruffalo Interview                                                                                        

Anyone who pays any attention to celebrity interviews will have noticed that women are almost always asked only stupid, boring and sexist questions and this act of sexism was brought to the forefront in a recent interview by Cosmo UK.

Cosmo UK conducted an interview with Scarlett Johansson and Mark Ruffalo several days ago about their upcoming movie Avengers: Age of Ultron. Their interviewer decided to flip the gender script and asked Ruffalo all of the boring questions like, “What will you be wearing to the premiere,” and “Did you go on a diet,” and asked Johansson whether she did all of her own stunts and what she liked about playing Black Widow.

While it was very obvious that the questions that were asked of Ruffalo were stupid (and the stupidity of the questions were only amplified by the fact that a man was being asked these questions), what I found to be most powerful about the interview was that Johansson finally had a chance to speak her mind and answer interesting and relevant questions.

It wasn’t until I heard Johansson speaking about her character in this interview that I realized that I had never heard her speak about an interesting topic and this just served to remind me of all of the times that the world has missed out on hearing interesting opinions from actresses and how little girls have missed out on being (potentially) inspired by an actress.

Interviewers just really need to step up their game because their insistence on asking the same old uninspired sexist questions over and over isn’t doing anyone a favor. All it is accomplishing is boring viewers and interviewees, reinforcing sexism, depriving successful women an opportunity to express themselves and making themselves sound stupid. Just come on. We can do better.

Reposted bymolotovcupcakeschaaffeminismastridmanxxmacounc4os
thatsridicarus
0909 441e 500

anqelicize:

GUYS DO YOU UNDERSTAND

HE ACTUALLY DID IT

Reposted bybirumolotovcupcakeschaafavaritiasaureusglupiasukacgirlfeminismSirenensangyouamn0gn0grealtinastridmanxxmacoun456danielbohrerconsomme

February 18 2015

thatsridicarus
7522 98b8 500

geekscoutcookies:

macoronnie:

I know its kinda long but its def worth the read, i stumbled across it while scrolling down my timeline… 

READ EVERY SINGLE ONE. 

Reposted bysofeministyouamthealexfeminismSirenensangwoodynook

October 16 2014

thatsridicarus
4377 80be

coraregina:

hawaii-n-jones:

The fact that both of these reactions came from males

This is basically the only instance where “not all men” applies because it’s not some whining shitlord trying to make it all about them, it’s literally men NOT being shitlords and actually being respectful of women as people.

A+ would date.

Reposted byfeminismSirenensangmkaynoacornymistick

October 08 2014

thatsridicarus

#YesAllWomen

Because my cousin shared 3 rape experiences she had
And on all three occasions
She was wearing sweats and was brutally beaten

So there goes your excuse
That my tight dress was asking for it
It might have escaped your attention,
But I don’t wake up in the mornings,
And put on a skirt thinking,
Will this get me raped?
I don’t put on a tank top hoping,
Maybe this one will.

#YesAllWomen

Because in school, they teach us that our bodies are offensive.

They pull us from classrooms
And hallways
Demanding if we have longer shorts,
Or even a sweater,
Reminding us that the boys are distracted,
That the boys go wild for a peeking shoulder,
Or the sight of a sun burned thigh,
Because their education is more important than ours.

#YesAllWomen

Because white men in pressed suits,
Expensive watches hanging from their wrists,
Red faces glinting with arrogance,
Have more say over my body than I do.

Because those same men,
Quoting the Bible and fake statistics,
Have never shed blood,
As a twisted sacrifice for being a woman.

Because those same men,
Have never walked the streets,
Fearing for their lives,
Clinging to keys between their fingers like a lifeline
With pepper spray in their bags,
Ready for someone to feel entitled to their body.

#YesAllWomen

Because when a man says no to us,
It is a fault in OUR character.
It is because we are not
Thin, tan, or perky enough for HIM.

Because when WE say no to a man,
Its still a fault in OUR character,
We are the cold, ruthless bitch,
Saying no to the nice guy,
Who offered to buy us a drink,
And Who complimented our hair.

#YesAllWomen

Because a UCSB entitled nine-teen year old boy,
Can record a video
Of his plans to shoot down all the
“Blond bimbos who denied him his right,”
And then do so,
Only to have his actions excused by the media,
Claiming he was depressed,
Instead of admitting that male entitlement is dangerous.

#YesAllWomen

Because I am done being silenced
And I am done being polite.
I am done sitting by
And watching
As a country hypocritically cries
Equality and justice
But doesn’t have equal pay
Lets men make decisions for a woman’s body
And blames the victim for the actions of a rapist.

#YesAllWomen

Because our NO won’t be enough one day.

#YesAllWomen

Because I wasn’t asking for it.

#YesAllWomen

Because “Boys Will Be Boys,” is still an excuse

#YesAllWomen

Because “Not All Men Are Like That,” is still a defense.

#YesAllWomen

Because enough blood has been spilled.

#YesAllWomen

Because I am sixteen years old, and I am so afraid, when I shouldn’t have to be.

W. R.

This poem was inspired by actual tweets from the #YesAllWomen trend on twitter. X
(via ileventeen)
Reposted bymanxxfeminismdarksideofthemoonStadtgespenstnefertari180siouryhirnschaumZuruimolotovcupcakeTokei-IhtoschaafSirenensangidl3xh0p3kmohrf

August 18 2014

thatsridicarus
Robot Hugs - Harrassment
Reposted bykatt katt

July 03 2014

thatsridicarus
4429 1a04
Anyone know who the original artist is? Cuz s(he) deserves a medal.
(via 9GAG)
Reposted bymolotovcupcakeIamdonehereincontrovertiblegamel1234lexxielogorea

May 30 2014

thatsridicarus
3663 2ab1 500

rasenth:

I felt so angry at the UCSB massacre (an article about this incident and a script of his video’s speech) and the sexism we’re blind to everyday so I drew about my opinions on sexism to channel my rage.

I’m very happy the #YesAllWomen tag is going strong on U.S. Twitter right now. :D

Reposted bywoodynookxjoancatherinestraycatPachadiadharacomicsPoxerarisolunamolotovcupcakekumikomynniaankinschlachtorosgehirnfaschingMrrrukfrittatensuppefeminismxmascolarafupduckmishastaglupiasukamkaynoaPorcelainciasteczko7

July 23 2013

thatsridicarus

ad campaign







Great ad campaign from the Maine Coalition Against Sexual Assault. More posters here. 
Reposted fromdarksideofthemoon darksideofthemoon viamanxx manxx

August 05 2012

thatsridicarus

racebending:

“Save the Pearls” is a vanity published YA novel trying to bill itself as the next “The Hunger Games.” The publisher says that “‘Save the Pearls turns the tables on racism.’”

It uses blackface as a plot device.

In author Victoria Foyt’s futuristic world, no one wants to mate with white people—or “pearls”—considered to be the ugliest humans oppressed by people of color. In order to survive, they must put on blackface make up to be attractive to the ruling class of “coals.” Hoyt explains: “their stunningly dark skin that carries the greatest amount of melanin…makes them the strongest, most powerful race alive.” The protagonist is a white girl who must smear her face with “midnight luster” make up in order to protect herself from radiation and in order to look beautiful to the oppressive “coals” in hopes that they will mate with her.

The rule in Eden’s post-apocalyptic world is: the darker the skin, the higher the mate-rate. Other factors calculated into one’s mate-rate include wealth or employment status. For example, Ronson Bramford, a handsome Coal titan of industry, is at the top of the heap with a mate rate of 98%. At age twenty-two, he only has two years left in which to mate—or else he’d probably have a 100% mate-rate. Tiger’s-Eyes, or Latinos, usually rate above Ambers, or Asians, in the future race wars. White-skinned Pearls offer little resistance to The Heat, and therefore, are at the bottom. Only a Cotton, or Albino, would be lower.”
THE MIND IT BOGGLES.

jedifreac:

bonnienoire:

wow we can only care about racial oppression when it’s about white people

it’s not like there aren’t already people who believe that reverse racism is a real thing or anything

not like the story of racial oppression is more complex than a difference in populace and biological differences. 

yeah ok.

You know how they say that homophobia/heterosexism is just this fear that “men will treat you the way you treat women” and anti-feminism is fear that “women will treat you the way men have treated them”? This is kind of like that, right, this fear that people of color will treat you like how white people have treated them without any real reflection on what privilege means.

jhenne-bean:

“TURNS THE TABLES ON RACISM”

seekingwillow:

seekingwillow:

—-

The claim: “TURNS THE TABLES ON RACISM”

The reality: No it doesn’t.

If you’ll notice:

 |*| White ppl? Pearls - A pretty precious/semi-precious gem

|*| Asian ppl? Ambers - Another pretty semi-precious gem

|*| Latin@s? Tiger-eyes - Another pretty semi-precious gem. One striped w/ dark and light.

 |*| Black folk? Coals - Something to be used; something which pollutes, something that rubs off on you, something not precious.

And yes, I did this list in this order on purpose. It’s the author’s chosen names, I only organized it according to current valuing of the materials.Turns the tables on racism my left tit. All this story does is expose the writer’s racism in stark, honking, stinking relief and their belief that anyone in the minority SHOULD be doing everything possible to appeal to the majority and fit in with them.

I’m not even touching a world full of PoC who’re obsessed with mating at an early/young age. Someone else can deal with that. My blood pressure says no.

Also there’s this, fromHuffingtonpost(always trust Huffingtonpost to bring the RaceFail)

“Conceivably, if the book had not reached the African-American community of readers, if such a category still exists, perhaps there might be some backlash. The first young African American reader who responded to me loved the book. But then, she’s the kind of free spirit who would eschew limiting herself to a single category.
Or perhaps — and this is what I hope — the YA generation sees race in a way that is unique to them, unique in our history. After all, they have arrived on the scene decades past the integration of schools and Jim Crow, even well past the days of The Cosby Show.
Soap-mouth-washing words that were forbidden in my youth now populate rap songs so often I wonder if, happily, they have lost their vile connotations.”

I repeat; this white woman is failing hard. Crap, I’m going to end up having to do a proper post on this bullshit on my regular blog. ‘African-American community of readers, if such a category still exists’? That’s some Louis McMaster Bujold shite right there. Along with this - ’ free spirit who would eschew limiting herself to a single category’ - ie if Black readers DO exist, they’re not often reading SciFi/Speculative Fiction type things. All followed up by ‘It looks soon like I’ll get to say the n-word!’

ETA: People keep mentioning what else the terms could be. But I think wanting to use the terms as is was the author’s original intent. Cause seriously - off the top of my flipping head?

Glass. Glass ass. Sun goes right through white people like glass. Meanwhile you’ve got Jets (seriously, between the terms Jetset and Jet magazine and the jewel Jet, makes so much sense for an culturally and economically dominant group). But all that requires not being a racist ass.

And before people even get into Crosses and Noughts? Do not forget there’s BEEN a book about what if Europe had it’s own people hunting in their small towns, selling them off to rich African tribes people and slavery had gone the other way. I forget the name right now. It was a British author, I believe. But even though it wasn’t the best, it at least thought about things like culture, appearance, beauty standards, being owned and thus controlled by a child, forced impregnation, the selling off of one’s children and the like.

paradiscacorbasi:

Holy —

I am just full of sputtering confusion and rage. 

annlarimer:

Jesus fuck. This is the kind of shit well-meaning white sixth graders write for homework and then wince over for the rest of their lives

panasonicyouth:

here’s some more context/information

it only gets worse, holy shit

Reposted bylotterlebentinu-qinkilljillfeminismmkaynoa

August 03 2012

thatsridicarus
6163 f474 500
Feminism vs Sexism: The Difference
(via 9GAG)
Reposted bycomicsbarefootgirlpetunientopfcoloredgrayscaletimsimbafh666straycatbigbear3001mynniasmoke11Species5618monkeyvaulthmu

August 21 2011

Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl